-
Recent Posts
-
On Twitter
Archives
Recent Comments
- Peter Zsoldos on Cleaning up test code
- Eric Lefevre-Ardant on Cleaning up test code
- Peter Zsoldos on Cleaning up test code
- Playframework + Google Guice (Español) « Having fun with Play framework! on Play Framework and Guice: use providers in Guice modules
- Eric Lefevre-Ardant on Java’s varargs are for unit tests
-
Category Archives: tdr
Data types in Slim
After an initial introduction video, one on comparaison operators, Bob Martin has now a video on Data Types in Slim, his Fit replacement in Fitnesse. Data types in Slim are simple. They can only be Strings and Lists, though it … Continue reading
Posted in fit, tdr
Leave a comment
Comparaison operators in Slim for Fitnesse
Now that the release of Slim is done, Bob Martin is spending time producing tutorial videos. The new one is about comparaisons in Slim. There are two majors things to learn in it: approximate equals ranges The ~= sign means “approximately equals … Continue reading
Posted in fit, tdr
2 Comments
Bob Martin releases Fitnesse with Slim
You are probably familiar with Fitnesse, a wiki site that wraps Fit. It is basically an environment that helps attaching tests to specifications. Some call this a Test-Driven Requirements (TDR) tool. It has been originally written by Robert C Martin … Continue reading
Posted in fit, tdr
5 Comments
Everything is vague to a degree you do not realise till you have tried to make it precise
I am currently reviewing the first draft of Gojko Adzic‘s book Agile Acceptance Testing (I am still at the beginning, but I like it so far). He has a citation from Bertrand Arthur Russell’s Philosophy of Logical Atomism that is … Continue reading
Behavior-Driven Development vs. Test-Driven Requirements
These days, I have had the opportunity to think more about Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) with tools such as JBehave, RSpec, TestDox, and Test-Driven Requirements (TDR) with tools such as Fit, FitNesse, GreenPepper, Concordion. Here are my conclusions.
Posted in bdd, tdr
2 Comments