Comments on: Valtech Days: Hudson Demo http://ericlefevre.net/wordpress/2007/10/30/valtech-days-hudson-demo/ Eric's Earnest Elucidations Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:59:21 +0100 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: barcelona spain http://ericlefevre.net/wordpress/2007/10/30/valtech-days-hudson-demo/comment-page-1/#comment-2556 barcelona spain Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:36:29 +0000 http://ericlefevre.net/wordpress/2007/10/30/valtech-days-hudson-demo/#comment-2556 I tend to agree on this with Eric as CruiseControl is just a tool. Whether it is written in Java should not be a big deal. I tend to agree on this with Eric as CruiseControl is just a tool. Whether it is written in Java should not be a big deal.

]]> By: redsolo http://ericlefevre.net/wordpress/2007/10/30/valtech-days-hudson-demo/comment-page-1/#comment-1945 redsolo Wed, 05 Dec 2007 20:40:45 +0000 http://ericlefevre.net/wordpress/2007/10/30/valtech-days-hudson-demo/#comment-1945 I agree as I never saw the need to re-invent the wheel in a different language. I dont care if a tool is written in C++, C#, Java or cobol; as long as it does its thing. I think CC could be so much more if the developers had pooled their efforts into one project, instead of working separately. I hope we will not see a Hudson.NET some day. I agree as I never saw the need to re-invent the wheel in a different language. I dont care if a tool is written in C++, C#, Java or cobol; as long as it does its thing. I think CC could be so much more if the developers had pooled their efforts into one project, instead of working separately. I hope we will not see a Hudson.NET some day.

]]> By: Eric Lefevre http://ericlefevre.net/wordpress/2007/10/30/valtech-days-hudson-demo/comment-page-1/#comment-1560 Eric Lefevre Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:26:46 +0000 http://ericlefevre.net/wordpress/2007/10/30/valtech-days-hudson-demo/#comment-1560 I understand your point, but I do not entirely agree with it. CruiseControl is just a tool. Whether it is written in Java should not be anymore of a concern than the fact that Subversion is written in C or some other tool in Delphi or Haskell. Surely the fact that CruiseControl Java is a more stable and active project with a lot more developers and more plugins is a more objective argument? (says the man who prefers Hudson) I understand your point, but I do not entirely agree with it.
CruiseControl is just a tool. Whether it is written in Java should not be anymore of a concern than the fact that Subversion is written in C or some other tool in Delphi or Haskell.
Surely the fact that CruiseControl Java is a more stable and active project with a lot more developers and more plugins is a more objective argument? (says the man who prefers Hudson)

]]> By: Etienne http://ericlefevre.net/wordpress/2007/10/30/valtech-days-hudson-demo/comment-page-1/#comment-1559 Etienne Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:58:21 +0000 http://ericlefevre.net/wordpress/2007/10/30/valtech-days-hudson-demo/#comment-1559 Hi Eric, One reason I see for using some re-implementation of CruiseControl written in Ruby is the need to reduce the dependency to technologies. For example, in my current project, I use C++, Ruby and Subversion. CruiseControl.rb is the perfect fit. I do not need to install anything more on the server than what I already have. CruiseControl.rb uses a ruby interpreter and can connect to subversion. That's all and enough. Hi Eric,

One reason I see for using some re-implementation of CruiseControl written in Ruby is the need to reduce the dependency to technologies.

For example, in my current project, I use C++, Ruby and Subversion. CruiseControl.rb is the perfect fit. I do not need to install anything more on the server than what I already have. CruiseControl.rb uses a ruby interpreter and can connect to subversion. That’s all and enough.

]]>